Humana and other health insurers reported obese and obscene profits and profit gains. The principal driver behind these is the "improvement" in the benefit ratio - decreasing payments for benefits (numerator) and increasing premiums (denominator). An insurance company that only pays out (in benefits) 82% of what it collects in premiums, provides its executives a gross compensation, reduces headcount, and reports profits of $340 million for THREE MONTHS...
This type of capitalis begs the question "how much profit does one person extract from another's pain and suffering?"
Meanwhile, the company's second-quarter consolidated benefit ratio -- the percentage of premiums paid to cover medical claims -- also improved from a year ago.
The company earned $340.1 million, or $2 per share, up from $281.8 million, or $1.67 per share, a year ago. Revenue rose 9.5 percent to $8.65 billion from $7.9 billion..."
Humana Reports Second Quarter 2010 Financial Results - Yahoo! Finance: "...Benefit expenses – The impact of GAAP to non-GAAP(a) reconciliation items on the consolidated benefit ratio (benefit expenses as a percent of premium revenues) is detailed in the following table:
Consolidated Benefit Ratio � 2Q10 � 1H10
GAAP � 81.9% � 82.6%
Higher-than-expected favorable prior-year medical claims reserve development (c) � 0.4% � 0.9%
Higher-than-expected favorable 1Q10 medical claims reserve development (c) � 1.0% � -0-
Non-GAAP (a) � 83.3% � 83.5%
� �
The 2Q10 consolidated benefit ratio of 81.9 percent compares to 83.3 percent in 2Q09. On a non-GAAP(a) basis the 2Q10 consolidated benefit ratio of 83.3 percent was unchanged versus the 2Q09 consolidated benefit ratio. The non-GAAP(a) consolidated benefit ratio for 2Q10 reflected the combined impact of a 120 basis point increase in the non-GAAP(a) benefit ratio for the Government Segment and a 520 basis point improvement in the non-GAAP(a) benefit ratio for the Commercial Segment. The drivers of these changes are detailed in the segment discussions below....Premiums and administrative services fees:
Consolidated Benefit Ratio � 2Q10 � 1H10
GAAP � 81.9% � 82.6%
Higher-than-expected favorable prior-year medical claims reserve development (c) � 0.4% � 0.9%
Higher-than-expected favorable 1Q10 medical claims reserve development (c) � 1.0% � -0-
Non-GAAP (a) � 83.3% � 83.5%
� �
The 2Q10 consolidated benefit ratio of 81.9 percent compares to 83.3 percent in 2Q09. On a non-GAAP(a) basis the 2Q10 consolidated benefit ratio of 83.3 percent was unchanged versus the 2Q09 consolidated benefit ratio. The non-GAAP(a) consolidated benefit ratio for 2Q10 reflected the combined impact of a 120 basis point increase in the non-GAAP(a) benefit ratio for the Government Segment and a 520 basis point improvement in the non-GAAP(a) benefit ratio for the Commercial Segment. The drivers of these changes are detailed in the segment discussions below....Premiums and administrative services fees:
Medicare Advantage premiums and administrative service fees of $4.89 billion in 2Q10 increased 18 percent compared to $4.15 billion in 2Q09, primarily due to an 18 percent increase in average Medicare Advantage membership year over year.
Medicare stand-alone PDP premiums of $700.2 million in 2Q10 increased 10 percent compared to $638.8 million in 2Q09, reflecting an 18 percent increase in premiums per member per month, partially offset by a 7 percent decline in average membership year over year.
Military services premiums and administrative services fees during 2Q10 decreased $38.7 million to $907.9 million compared to $946.6 million in 2Q09.""
No comments:
Post a Comment