Google
Showing posts with label social justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social justice. Show all posts

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Society's F: Fabrication of A Social Fabric

A couple of disturbing articles provide 'rich' insights into the turmoil underneath the calm waters of a society in trouble.

The WSJ's article, Communities Pay for High Prison Rate, discusses the problems faced by communities in states like Arizona where people are raising their grand-kids and and in some cases great grand-kids because a parent (or parents) are in prison.

The NYT, in its article "Given a Shovel, Americans Dig Deeper Into Debt" presents the case study of one person whose home is in foreclosure and and who is in dire financial straits. It describes the exploitation of her situation by giants like Citi and Capital One, while recognizing that ultimately she was responsible for her actions. Here is some data from this article:

"Today, Americans carry $2.56 trillion in consumer debt, up 22 percent since 2000 alone, according to the Federal Reserve Board. The average household’s credit card debt is $8,565, up almost 15 percent from 2000.College debt has more than doubled since 1995. The average student emerges from college carrying $20,000 in educational debt.Household debt, including mortgages and credit cards, represents 19 percent of household assets, according to the Fed, compared with 13 percent in 1980. Even as this debt was mounting, incomes stagnated for many Americans. As a result, the percentage of disposable income that consumers must set aside to service their debt — a figure that includes monthly credit card payments, car loans, mortgage interest and principal — has risen to 14.5 percent from 11 percent just 15 years ago."

When prudence falls by the way side and citizens want to have the immediate gratification, companies work overtime to exploit this weakness and the government machinery is oiled to help these companies. The underlying social fabric that binds society is not just fraying at the edges, it is becoming like a donut with a huge emptiness in the middle.

Monday, March 24, 2008

PAC your problems- Look through RBV Lenses

PAC = Partition and Conquer; RBV = Resource-Based View

Doc has made an intriguing comment on my last post, referencing a resourcer-resource mismatch and the efforts of the affected to reach the resource in a quicker, better and efficient manner. This broad topic can be explored in many ways.
An Operations Researcher like myself looks at the world through a 'Resource-Based View' lens- or RBV. To him, the world (or the individual) has finite (often scarce) resources that have to be allocated so as to maximize (or minimize) certain objective functions. Often there are constraints on these resources, so this view is also referred to as Constraint Based Optimization (CBO).
At an institutional level, taking this view and using the PAC (partition and conquer) approach to the bigger problems has resulted in solutions that may be locally optimal for certain groups or individuals but are far from being optimal in a broader social sense.
As an example, by a number of estimates the world food supply in the recent past has been more than sufficient to feed the entire world population, but clearly dire hunger exists in several parts of the U.S., not to mention other countries. This resource has been allocated 'optimally' or dismally, depending on who's asked. Currently the shift by farmers to planting corn for ethanol is 'optimal' for one constituency, painful for another. There are plenty of lung surfactant drugs available to treat babies born with small lungs, but still babies die because of lack of access or affordability. OTOH Bill Gates decided that the optimal way to 'consume' his resources is through not-for-profit socially benefiting activities.

For an individual to get access to a resource he/she needs another resource to exchange or substitute, and information about resource availability and costs. Information asymmetry can distort resource constraints and allocation and deployment, but at the end of the day, it is the objective function- what we want to maximize or minimize, that matters. To that end, universal access to information and the education to process that information is, IMHO, the only long-term solution. Part of the education is 'social justice.'

An enjoyable and interesting book: Animal, Vegetable, Miracle: A Year of Food Life
by Barbara Kingsolver et al.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Education in America- An Article I wrote on January 25, 2007

Reports of potential employers and educators expressing serious concern at the skill levels of our high school and college students and their inadequate preparation for professional life are appearing with increasing frequency. A report[i] released on Oct. 2 by a consortium of business research organizations states that “The future U.S. workforce is here—and it is woefully ill-prepared for the demands of today’s (and tomorrow’s) workplace.” While this is a serious issue, a more ominous one is the preparation of today’s youth to be the ‘public’ citizens of the future. The youth of today are learning from the examples set by their parents, business leaders, politicians, educators and the like- examples that stand out for their notoriety.

A recent study[ii] found that 56% of graduate business students admitted to cheating one or more times in the past academic year, compared to 47% of nonbusiness students. Other reports indicate that acts of academic dishonesty, including cheating, are common in colleges and universities. On December 3, 2006, Columbia's Graduate School of Journalism announced that it was investigating charges of academic misconduct, i.e. cheating, in the final exam for the required ethics course "Critical Issues in Journalism." Before vilifying the students, the American public at large needs to examine its own acts, and the way it rewards positive and negative behaviors and actions. It is also imperative to remember that a “corporation” is a legal entity, and the actions of a corporation are always performed by people. Here are a few examples.

1. On January 2, a New York subway rider, Wesley Autrey, jumped onto the tracks of the New York Subway to save a man’s life from an oncoming train. He later pointed out that while many people were present, only he and two women aided the distressed person. He was later rewarded with the Bronze Medallion, New York City’s highest civilian honor, by the Mayor. Donald Trump cashed in on some publicity by giving a gift of $10,000, and a few others made other gifts to Mr. Autrey, a true hero.
On the other hand, on January 3, the Board of Directors of Home Depot Inc., removed Robert Nardelli from the Chief Executive Officer position for poor performance. After paying him $225 million during his six-years as the CEO, the Board gave him a farewell gift of $210 million as part of his separation package. Pfizer Inc.'s Board asked its CEO, Henry (Hank) McKinnell, to take “an early retirement,” in part because Pfizer’s stock price declined more than 40% when the market was up . However, the Board gave him a retirement package valued at more than $180 million as a farewell gift.

2. President Bush, in his address to the Nation on January 10, said “The situation in Iraq is unacceptable to the American people -- and it is unacceptable to me. …Where mistakes have been made, the responsibility rests with me.” Without saying that mistakes have been made, it is unclear as to what he meant by the statement “the responsibility rests with me.” Taking responsibility means paying a personal price for a person’s actions. For instance, on Mar 14, 2006, South Korean Prime Minister Lee Hae-chan resigned because he accepted responsibility for playing golf at a time when the country’s rail workers were on strike.

3. In the same January 10 speech, Bush reminded people that “The year ahead will demand more patience, sacrifice, and resolve.” While the families of those serving in the armed forces have demonstrated plenty of patience and sacrifice , the President’s sacrifices are unknown, as yet. Of course, he has taken more than 330 vacation days during his tenure, including an extended retreat at his Texas ranch last year which Hurricane Katrina rudely cut short. President Bush, based on public reports, apparently does not even sacrifice his sleep.

4. In a December 29, 2006 SEC filing, Apple Computer Inc. disclosed that records were falsified to support a 2001 options grant to its CEO Steve Jobs of 7.5 million shares. Apple disclosed that this grant was ``improperly recorded as occurring at a special board meeting on Oct. 19, 2001. Such a board meeting did not occur.'' The Company recognized total additional non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $84 million after tax, including $4 million and $7 million in fiscal years 2006 and 2005 respectively. In addition, the company reported that “although the investigation found that CEO Steve Jobs was aware or recommended the selection of some favorable grant dates, he did not receive or financially benefit from these grants or appreciate the accounting implications.” It does not seem to matter that a person who made hundreds of millions by exercising stock options is not expected to know the immorality of “backdating” options, or appreciate the accounting mischief. Apple has cleared him of wrongdoing, and the shareholders have bid up Apple’s stock price to an all time high.

5. On January 9, 2007, Lou Dobbs railed against Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on his Lou Dobbs Tonight show on CNN. In a piece titled a “Leftist Menace” he said that “Venezuela's leftist president, Hugo Chavez, takes a major step toward socialism with his plans to nationalize two key industries in his country.” Earlier, President Chavez had said that he would consider nationalizing Venezuela's electrical and telecommunications assets because they "ought to be the property of the Venezuelan nation." Ironically, a little later in the same broadcast, Mr. Dobbs severely criticized state governments, including New Jersey and its governor John Corzine, for selling state toll ways to private interests. He claimed that these assets belonged to the ‘American people.” Of course, Mr. Dobbs does not call himself a socialist or a “leftist menace” for suggesting government control of assets.

America’s future depends on its youth. It is vital that parents, politicians, businesspeople, teachers, and others collectively educate them, with personal examples, to engage in broader intellectual discourse than to just apply labels, and reward them for socially positive behaviors.



[i] Report titled “Are They Really Ready To Work? Employers’ Perspectives on the Basic Knowledge and Applied Skills of New Entrants to the 21st Century U.S. Workforce.” Published Oct. 2, 2006 by The Conference Board, Corporate Voices for Working Families, the Partnership for 21st Century Skills, and the Society for Human Resource Management.

[ii] Paper titled "Academic Dishonesty in Graduate Business Programs: Prevalence, Causes, & Proposed Action,” by Trevino, Linda., et al, to be published in an upcoming issue of the Academy of Management Learning and Education.

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Civic Engagement and Social Justice

Civic Engagement, Social Justice and Integrated Learning are the buzz words being hummed in the hallowed halls of higher learning (see AAC&U). How to get students to be engaged civically and to deal with the issues of social justice is an interesting challenge. Further, integrating learning across experiences, both in and out of the classroom, is conceptually elegant but practically migraine-inducing. At the same time, the realities of outsourcing and the pressure on students to be able to compete make educators think.
Last fall, I decided to experiment with these ideas. I offered a new course titled 'Local Choices, Global Effects' to incoming freshmen. The course description read "Students, like other members of society, face choices in nearly every aspect of life. These choices often made locally can in the aggregate have powerful global consequences. This course introduces students to “sustainable living” concepts including food, energy, and waste management. It examines how individual choices in these areas can lead to significant global effects.Models from multiple disciplines including economics, physical sciences, political science, and business are used in analyzing the global impact of local choices. Students gain hands-on experience in identifying, selecting and implementing their choices in the College campus and within the community." I did not expect this to appeal to freshmen, but thirteen students signed up. I co-taught this course with a colleague from Student Affairs. In this course we dealt primarily with civic engagement, with some elements of social justice and an integrated learning approach. It is interesting to read to the reflections by students. This course has changed their lives, and it has taught me that even garbage (waste management) can be great food for thought. These freshmen and others have certainly given me a flash of light- illuminating positive change in the world....one student clued me in to using wind-up flashlights!