Bob Herbert of the NYT has an excellent post called "An Uneasy Feeling" in which he talks about a lack of direction for the country. While many praise capitalism for the great success of the U.S. and want the government out of the way, not many recognize that it is the public (government) investments that have paved the way for this success- capitalism is just a beneficiary. The rail networks and the highways brought forth a new era in commerce. While the past two decades have belonged to the Internet, it should be remembered that the government's DoD built the basic plumbing for the Network. Quite a few of the technologies used today are derived from public sector R&D.
Wednesday, January 06, 2010
We've lost that lovely feeling...
Tuesday, January 05, 2010
A Relevant Questioning of the Relevance of Education
Ms. Kate Zernike, in an interesting article in the NYT, "Making College ‘Relevant’" provides some interesting data points--- "...The University of Louisiana, Lafayette, is eliminating its philosophy major, while Michigan State University is doing away with American studies and classics, after years of declining enrollments in those majors. And in a class called “The English Major in the Workplace,” at the University of Texas, Austin, students read “Death of a Salesman” but also learn to network, write a résumé and come off well in an interview...Career advisers say that colleges and universities need to do a better job helping students understand the connection between a degree and a job. At some institutions, this means career officers are heading into the classroom.Last fall at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, the career office began integrating workplace lessons into capstone research seminars for humanities majors. In one of three classes taught by Anne Scholl-Fiedler, the director, she asks students to develop a 30-second commercial on their “personal brand.” “When somebody asks, ‘How are you going to use that English degree?’ you need to be able to clearly articulate what you are able to do,” she says. “If you don’t know, employers probably won’t either.” At the University of Texas, Ms. Brooks says, many parents drop their children off freshman year asking, “How can my child transfer to the business school?” She tries to establish the value of the liberal arts with a series of courses called “The Major in the Workplace.” Students draw what she calls a “major map,” an inventory of things they have learned to do around their major. Using literature — “The Great Gatsby,” perhaps, or “Death of a Salesman” — she gets students to think about how the themes might apply to a workplace, then has them read Harvard Business Review case studies. The goal, she says, is to get students to think about how an English major (or a psychology or history major) might view the world differently, and why an employer might value that.“There’s this linear notion that what you major in equals your career,” Ms. Brooks says. “I’m sure it works for some majors. If you want to be an electrical engineer, that major looks pretty darn good.“The truth is,” she says, “students think too much about majors. But the major isn’t nearly as important as the toolbox of skills you come out with and the experiences you have.”"
Monday, January 04, 2010
Higher Education...needs to be really "higher"
Had an interesting discussion with a friend adn colleague about higher education and transparency. Many faculty members take the easy way out, but there are some, like my friend, who expect a lot of out themselves and their students. He, like me, makes all previous exams and other material available to the students. Both of us also work hard in creating evaluations that allow for discrimination of students' abilities. We have to expect much higher level of performance from ourselves before asking that of students.
Sunday, January 03, 2010
No Conflict Here
NYT reported today that "The owner of two research hospitals affiliated with the Harvard Medical School has imposed restrictions on outside pay for two dozen senior officials who also sit on the boards of pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies. The limits come in the wake of growing criticism of the ties between industry and academia.."